Friday, September 24, 2010

[android-developers] Re: "Proguard, Android, and the Licensing Server", or...

The options were listed in preference.
I typically use 1 or 2 or sometimes a combo of both.

Option 3 is for when I am feeling very lazy and don't expect many
instance of projects using the same build config, so no payback on
doing 1 or 2.


On Sep 24, 11:56 am, Indicator Veritatis <mej1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I agree that from the description in his post, it is not really clear
> that it gets him "off the hook" at all. But perhaps he was assuming
> the reader knows something about maven.
>
> But I am more concerned about his step 3, which sounds like a recipe
> for trouble: copying the build. Now how do you maintain all the copies
> and keep them in sync? Or if they are not in sync, how do you keep
> each one of them up to date with whatever peculiar needs they have? It
> sounds suspiciously like keeping the same information in more than one
> place, a classic no-no.
>
> On Sep 23, 6:11 am, JP <joachim.pfeif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 22, 11:53 pm, William Ferguson <william.ferguson...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > But hey, I place higher value than some on those 3 : simple, clear and
> > > maintainable.
>
> > Nice framework, but I don't see how you're "off the hook". Imagine
> > you're under time pressure to get a release out and you realize
> > Proguard messes up your release. Now you have to go and mess with the
> > settings, hoping you can dial it within a few minutes.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

No comments:

Post a Comment