Saturday, February 12, 2011

[android-developers] Re: StageFright: why are you not using JavaBeans?

This is only tangential to the real topic, but I have to comment on
Java Beans: I fully agree with Allen Holub. Beans are NOT good
examples of object oriented code. So I am glad they are not used in
Android.

On Feb 10, 8:23 pm, ss <mno....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Android doesn't use JavaBeans, period.
>
> Thanks for the reply, it certainly helps.
> The reason I asked was because a (superficial) glance at the api at
>
> http://developer.android.com/reference/java/beans/package-summary.html
>
> had some entries for java.beans. now that you mention it, the stuff for
> BeanInfo and the like are not available.
>
> So what is the principle behind StageFright as compared to GStreamer?  - Or
> am I comparing apples and oranges here?
> Are any usage examples available ?
>
> - hide quoted text -On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:48 PM, ss <mno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > - show quoted text -
> > Hello!
> > Im relatively new to Android, and on the verge of using StageFright.
>
> > I am curious to know why StageFright has been designed the way it is in the
> > GingerBread release. Why have Google NOT used JavaBeans - it would have been
> > so easy to write new codecs and new Media Sinks as JavaBeans, and the
> > Framework could have provided a means for any application to have a
> > mix-and-match of sources and sinks.
>
> > Thanks and BR
> > Shrikumar
>
> > --

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

No comments:

Post a Comment