I'm a bit fuzzy on the implementation details, but I think I can figure this out.
Thanks!
-Chad
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Nikolay Elenkov <nikolay.elenkov@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Chad Ata <chadata@gmail.com> wrote:You could embed the hash as a resource with a non-obvious name,
> Thanks for the response Nikolay,
>
> I was hoping to avoid server-side checks because I don't want potential lag
> or bugs to affect the legit users. But I'll consider your suggestion if this
> becomes a big problem for us.
>
and tripple-base64 encode it for extra fun if you don't want to use a
server. If they are changing/modifying your resources, it might be
better to store bits of it in code and calculate it dynamically
though.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment