Not all services are local.
I guess that's the main reason for async protocol, which assumes the most general case. But then again, only developers of Android know for sure :-)
--
Kostya Vasilyev -- http://kmansoft.wordpress.com
30.07.2010 1:01 пользователь "Jeroen Kransen" <jeroen@kransen.nl> написал:--
Thank you so much, Kostya! Indeed it turns out to be an asynchronous
call. It makes the design of the Activity slightly more verbose, but
at least I got it working. Are there imperative reasons why the
service is not returned synchronously? Is it very costly to
(instantiate and) return a local Service? If not, it would be a nice
feature to have the bindService block, or at least to have the option
through a method parameter that we want to wait for it like
bindService(..., boolean willWait).
Thanks again!
Jeroen
> 30.07.2010 0:21 пользователь "Jeroen Kransen" <jer...@kransen.nl> написал:
On 29 jul, 22:32, Kostya Vasilyev <kmans...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I remember right, starting a ser...
>
> This is the only serious logging I get in LogCat. Sometimes after that
> I get a timeout on the ...--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" g...
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment